Renfrewshire Councillors Reject Office Development Plans in Paisley

BREAKING: Plans to demolish empty commercial units in Paisley and replace them with a new office and storage facility have been refused by Renfrewshire councillors. The decision came during a heated session of the planning and climate change policy board, where the proposal faced significant backlash.

The application, lodged by Allison Architecture on behalf of Lambert and Son Properties, aimed to convert a site on Hawkhead Road—currently used as a builder’s yard—into a modern single-storey facility. The existing structure has been described as being in a state of disrepair and has remained vacant for several years.

Despite a recommendation for approval from the council’s chief planning officer, which noted the project’s potential benefits, the proposal sparked 52 objections from local residents. The majority of the 13 council members ultimately sided against the development, with Councillor John McNaughtan leading the charge for rejection.

In his remarks, McNaughtan stated, “I’m aware that we refused an earlier application and this is clearly an improvement, but I’m still unconvinced.” He emphasized concerns about the site’s intensification of use and its proximity to surrounding residential areas, which he argued would negatively impact local residents.

Officials highlighted that the application would have an “unacceptable impact” on the amenity of the nearby homes. The council’s official decision notice pointed to the proposal’s height, proximity to property boundaries, and window placements as critical factors in their refusal.

This development is particularly significant given the area’s transition from commercial to residential use. McNaughtan noted that the site is now surrounded by housing, making the intended office and storage facility less compatible with the community’s needs.

As the Renfrewshire Council navigates community concerns and planning regulations, residents will be watching closely for any future proposals related to this site. The implications of this rejection may ripple through local property development discussions, emphasizing the importance of community input in urban planning efforts.

Stay tuned for more updates on this developing story as the council and residents evaluate the next steps in addressing the future of this site.