The Appeal Court of Montenegro has confirmed that the resignation of Judge Vesna Moštrokol was driven by both personal and professional reasons. These factors, along with issues related to her role within the court, are protected under the appropriate standards of privacy and dignity associated with judicial functions. This announcement comes in response to media speculation surrounding changes in the composition of the panel handling the case known publicly as the “state coup.”
In a formal statement from the Appeal Court, it was clarified that the adjustments were made at Judge Moštrokol’s personal request. She previously presided over the panel responsible for ruling on an appeal from the State Prosecutor’s Office (SDT) related to this high-profile case. The court emphasized its commitment to adhering to legal standards and procedural rules, ensuring that the rights of all parties are fully respected.
The Appeal Court stated, “As always, the court will act in accordance with the law and procedural rules, fully respecting the rights of the parties and the principle of legality.” This assurance aims to maintain the integrity of the judicial process amidst the ongoing proceedings.
Regarding the procedural implications of the change in the panel, the court noted that each situation will be managed in line with the Criminal Procedure Code and established judicial practices. The court reiterated its obligation to ensure the legality of proceedings and impartiality in decision-making.
While the Appeal Court refrained from discussing the decision-making process or any potential procedural actions in the ongoing case, it highlighted the importance of avoiding any undue influence that could jeopardize fairness in judicial proceedings.
The statement concluded with a commitment to transparency within the confines of the law, emphasizing that public trust in the judiciary is built on lawful and impartial actions, rather than media speculation.
