A controversial demand by Hackney Council has sparked outrage after it suggested that a family with an autistic child must prove that public transport triggers distressing meltdowns. The council’s insistence arises amid ongoing housing issues faced by Charity Oppong and her children, who are at risk of eviction for alleged tenancy fraud.
The council has dismissed a supporting letter from Kayden Oppong’s head teacher, which includes medical professionals’ opinions, along with his autism diagnosis and Education, Health and Care Plan (EHCP). This documentation is deemed insufficient by the council, which has proposed that Kayden take a bus ride accompanied by its own medical assessor to determine the extent of his difficulties while travelling.
Charity Oppong has lived in the council flat for nearly 20 years, having moved in with a relative who later vacated the premises. Although she continued to pay rent, the council initiated eviction proceedings in 2021, citing tenancy fraud due to the absence of a formal tenancy transfer. A court subsequently issued an eviction warrant last year.
The council acknowledges the family’s distress but maintains that it must ensure any housing offered is suitable for the family’s specific needs. A spokesperson indicated that Kayden’s situation is being carefully considered, stating, “We understand how distressing this situation is for the family.” The council has suggested temporary accommodation in Newham, but the family argues that relocating would severely disrupt Kayden’s education and support network.
Kayden, aged seven, suffers from severe autism, making him prone to meltdowns caused by sensory overload and anxiety, particularly on public transport. His sister, Nana, expressed her concerns to the Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS), questioning who would manage Kayden during a meltdown if the council proceeded with its proposal. She remarked, “I thought this was about safeguarding and protecting children.”
The family’s advocates have voiced their concerns over the council’s approach, labeling it “bizarre.” Activist Kate Belgrave criticized the proposal, suggesting it amounts to placing Kayden in an environment he cannot handle to document his distress. This sentiment reflects a broader concern about the treatment of neurodivergent individuals in challenging situations.
Research from the National Autistic Society indicates that a significant percentage of autistic individuals experience increased meltdowns and sensory overload while travelling. A 2024 survey revealed that 62% of respondents reported such issues, particularly on buses, trains, and taxis. Additionally, a recent report from King’s College London highlighted the “torture-like” conditions faced by neurodivergent children in temporary accommodations.
The Oppong family has garnered support from local activists, who have physically blocked bailiffs from entering their home as they fight the eviction. A court recently granted a stay on the eviction for eight weeks, allowing time for a judicial review and an ongoing safeguarding assessment by social services.
Despite the family’s pleas and supporting documentation, Hackney Council has maintained its position. The spokesperson emphasized that the family has the right to request a review of the temporary housing offer if it does not meet their needs. The council also stated that they could provide transport for children with an EHCP if necessary.
As the situation unfolds, the community continues to rally around the Oppong family, advocating for a solution that prioritizes Kayden’s well-being and educational stability. The family’s struggle highlights ongoing challenges faced by families with special needs children in navigating housing and support systems.
