During a heated session of Prime Minister’s Questions (PMQs), Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer faced intense criticism regarding the UK government’s recent agreement concerning the Chagos Islands. Conservative MP Lewis Cocking urged the Prime Minister to abandon what he termed the “nonsense” of the Chagos Islands deal, suggesting that the funds being allocated to this agreement could instead address a significant £28 billion funding gap identified by military leaders.
Cocking emphasized the growing global threats and pointed out that the Ministry of Defence has indicated an urgent need for an additional £28 billion to ensure national security. He challenged the Prime Minister, asking, “Will the Prime Minister commit to that or will he continue to put the interests of foreign governments and countries above our own?”
Starmer defended the government’s position, asserting that Diego Garcia, the largest island in the Chagos archipelago, serves as a crucial military base with essential capabilities for allied nations. He stated, “Our decision was welcomed by our allies, the Five Eyes, India, and the United States.” In contrast, he noted that the decision faced opposition from nations such as Russia, adding, “the Tories following Reform, Reform following Putin.”
Details of the Chagos Islands Agreement
The Chagos Islands deal, which has been a subject of contention, involves the UK transferring control of the islands to Mauritius. The agreement was formalized in May 2022, allowing the UK to maintain a lease on the military base on Diego Garcia. This arrangement emerged after extensive negotiations initiated by the previous Conservative government, following a 2019 advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice that recommended the UK cede control of the islands.
As part of the treaty, the UK government has established a £40 million fund to support Chagossians who were forcibly removed from the islands. Additionally, the UK has committed to paying Mauritius at least £120 million annually over the duration of the 99-year agreement, which translates to a total financial commitment of at least £13 billion in cash terms. The government, however, estimates that the annual cost will be around £101 million, while critics argue that the expenses could be significantly higher than projected.
The ongoing debate over the Chagos Islands deal underscores the complexities of British foreign policy, particularly in relation to military strategy and historical injustices. As discussions continue, the implications of this agreement will likely remain a focal point in UK politics, especially as concerns over national security and international relations evolve.
