UPDATE: A shocking court case unfolds as a 38-year-old man, Michael Barron, was allegedly killed during a disturbing encounter with Josh Baxter, 28, after meeting on the dating app Grindr. The trial at Minshull Street Crown Court reveals harrowing details of the events leading to Barron’s death on January 26, 2025, which prosecutors describe as a reckless act tied to high-risk sexual activities.
According to court proceedings, Barron and Baxter exchanged explicit messages prior to their meeting, with Baxter allegedly encouraging Barron to consume excessive alcohol, rendering him unconscious. Prosecutors assert that Baxter then restrained Barron face-down, during which he purportedly choked him with such force that it fractured his neck, leading to cerebral hypoxia and cardiac arrest.
“To act as Mr. Baxter did was beyond reckless,” stated prosecutor Anna Whyte KC, emphasizing that Baxter was aware of the risks involved in their sexual activity. The chilling nature of the case escalates with allegations that after the incident, Baxter searched terms such as “If you accidentally kill someone by strangling them in sex do you go to prison?” and “purple face while sleeping.”
Baxter’s actions following Barron’s collapse raise serious questions about his intentions. After allegedly ordering food from Deliveroo, he messaged other men on Grindr while Barron remained restrained, and later called for emergency services only after searching online for signs of life.
The court heard that both men had discussed their sexual preferences candidly, with Barron consenting to various acts, including choking and BDSM. However, prosecutors argue that consent does not absolve Baxter of responsibility if he foresaw the potential for serious harm.
Baxter remains adamant in his denial of charges of manslaughter and unlawful infliction of grievous bodily harm. He was arrested the day after Barron’s death and remained silent during police questioning.
This trial, expected to last up to two weeks, exposes the dark underbelly of high-risk sexual encounters facilitated by dating apps. As the jury hears more harrowing details, the implications of this case resonate deeply, igniting conversations about consent, safety, and responsibility in sexual relationships.
As developments unfold, the public watches closely, awaiting the court’s decision in a case that starkly highlights the dangers inherent in unregulated sexual encounters. Stay tuned for updates as this trial continues.
